Maximizing IOC Impact

I’ve been thinking about threat intelligence lately. Specifically: indicators of compromise (IOC), how and where to share them to cause maximum pain to adversaries and help as many organizations as possible protect themselves.

I regularly analyze malware traffic from sandboxes such as ANY.RUN, Triage, JoeSandbox and Hybrid Analysis. Pulling fresh PCAPs is an easy way to find malware command-and-control (C2) traffic to previously unknown C2 servers. This method can even reveal new and unreported C2 protocols. I often use CapLoader and NetworkMiner to extract network IOCs, such as:

• Domain names
• IP:port
• URIs
• JA3 / JA3S hashes
• JA4 fingerprints
• X.509 certificate thumbprints
• packet pattern/signature

These indicators can be found in the lower sections of David J. Bianco’s pyramid of pain. But that doesn’t mean they’re not worth sharing — they’re easy to detect, have low false-positive rates, and are very actionable. Their main drawback is short lifetime, so rapid and wide IOC distribution matters.

Image: ASCII pyramid from Optimizing IOC Retention Time

False positives are a real concern, so manual verification of an IOC is required before sharing. Many IOCs are already reported to threat-intel sharing platforms, like ThreatFox, OTX or one of the many MISP instances out there, but I frequently find ones that aren’t. When I discover an IOC, I typically consider these options:

• Report directly to the hosting provider, registrar or network owner.
• Share with a national or sector CERT.
• Share with an ISAC.
• Publish to threat-sharing platforms (ThreatFox/URLhaus/OTX/MISP/AbuseIPDB/etc).
• Publish in a blog post or on social media.

I generally pick outlets case-by-case. Sometimes by convenience, sometimes by where I expect to achieve the greatest impact. Is there a single best destination? Often not, it depends.

Sending an IOC to every channel is comprehensive, but time-consuming. Ideally, a verified IOC drop point that automatically propagates to all the right places would be fantastic! But as far as I know, no such service exists.

I mostly look at malware that hit many victims, which is why it makes sense to prioritize fast, broad distribution (free threat-intel services and blog/social posts). But I have also investigated APT attacks and state-sponsored campaigns, such as Man-on-the-Side attacks, SSL MITM attacks in China as well as DNS traffic from Cozy Bear’s SolarWinds hack. The right place to share IOCs for APT attacks is often different than for mainstream malware. For targeted or sensitive operations, I recommend reaching out to victims, CERTs or a trusted intermediary.

Factors affecting the choice of IOC sharing method:

• Scope and scale of impact: Mass-distribution malware should be blocked widely. Notify specific victims or CERTs on targeted attacks.
• Lifetime and volatility: Short-lived IOCs (IPs, domains) benefit from fast, broad distribution. Longer-lived indicators are better shared in reports or blog posts that provide more depth and context.
• False-positive risk: Prefer channels that support easy updates/removals and allow others to validate or comment.
• Remediation: If a takedown or abuse report is appropriate, contact providers or registrars directly.
• Victimology: Choose platforms aligned with who needs to act. ISACs/CERTs for sectors, targeted notifications for known victims, open feeds for broad coverage.

Many companies and organizations engage in mutual sharing in closed trust groups, expecting that by sharing with others, they will return the favor. This creates a "win-win" situation for the trust group members, while the wider community misses out. As someone who doesn't require IOCs, I find that this approach can limit my reach. I prefer to get information out to as many people as possible, as quickly as possible, with minimum effort. I’ve also noticed a growing commercialization of threat intelligence, which is both good and bad. It can provide funding for threat-intel platforms, but may also limit reach when threat feeds and APIs get paywalled.

Workflow for IOC sharing:

1. Identify a potential malicious indicator (IP/domain/JA4 etc).
2. Pivot on the indicator to verify maliciousness and check for false positives.
3. If uncertain, ask in a trust-group, forum or request input on social media.
4. Check existing public feeds and databases for the IOC.
5. Assess urgency, impact, and victimology.
6. If new and high-impact: submit to one or several open sharing platforms.
7. If you have additional context: share it in a blog post or social notice.
8. If targeted or sensitive: notify the appropriate CERT or affected organizations privately.
9. If abuse/takedown is feasible: report to provider/registrar or request assistance from a national CERT.

I’m interested in hearing how others approach this. What works for you, and how do you maximize IOC sharing with minimal effort? Reach out via social media, email or share your thoughts in a writeup or blog post. Also, if you run an automated IOC propagation service, please reach out!

Posted by Erik Hjelmvik on Monday, 08 June 2026 07:00:00 (UTC/GMT)

Tags: #IOC​ #C2​ #ThreatFox​

QakBot C2 Traffic

In this video I analyze network traffic from a QakBot (QBot) infection in order to identify the Command-and-Control (C2) traffic. The analyzed PCAP file is from malware-traffic-analysis.net.

IOC List

• C2 IP and port: 80.47.61.240:2222
• C2 IP and port: 185.80.53.210:443
• QakBot proxy IP and port: 23.111.114.52:65400
• JA3: 72a589da586844d7f0818ce684948eea
• JA3S: ec74a5c51106f0419184d0dd08fb05bc
• JA3S: fd4bc6cea4877646ccd62f0792ec0b62
• meieou.info X.509 cert hash: 9de2a1c39fbe1952221c4b78b8d21dc3afe53a3e
• meieou.info X.509 cert Subject OU: Hoahud Duhcuv Dampvafrog
• meieou.info X.509 cert Issuer O: Qdf Wah Uotvzke LLC.
• gifts.com X.509 cert hash: 0c7a37f55a0b0961c96412562dd0cf0b0b867d37
• HTML Body Hash: 22e5446e82b3e46da34b5ebce6de5751664fb867
• HTML Title: Welcome to CentOS

Links

• QakBot PCAP download (malware-traffic-analysis.net)
• 80.47.61.240 (VirusTotal)
• 80.47.61.240:2222 (ThreatFox)
• 80.47.61.240 (Feodo Tracker)
• 80.47.61.240 (Censys)
• 185.80.53.210 (Censys)

For more analysis of QakBot network traffic, check out my Hunting for C2 Traffic video.

Posted by Erik Hjelmvik on Thursday, 02 March 2023 12:43:00 (UTC/GMT)

Tags: #QakBot​ #QBot​ #C2​ #Video​ #malware-traffic-analysis.net​ #ThreatFox​ #ec74a5c51106f0419184d0dd08fb05bc​ #fd4bc6cea4877646ccd62f0792ec0b62​ #CapLoader​ #NetworkMiner​

Emotet C2 and Spam Traffic Video

This video covers a life cycle of an Emotet infection, including initial infection, command-and-control traffic, and spambot activity sending emails with malicious spreadsheet attachments to infect new victims.

The video was recorded in a Windows Sandbox in order to avoid accidentally infecting my Windows PC with malware.

Initial Infection

Palo Alto's Unit 42 sent out a tweet with screenshots and IOCs from an Emotet infection in early March. A follow-up tweet by Brad Duncan linked to a PCAP file containing network traffic from the infection on Malware-Traffic-Analysis.net.

Image: Screenshot of original infection email from Unit 42

• Attachment MD5: 825e8ea8a9936eb9459344b941df741a

Emotet Download

The PCAP from Malware-Traffic-Analysis.net shows that the Excel spreadsheet attachment caused the download of a DLL file classified as Emotet.

Image: CapLoader transcript of Emotet download

• DNS: diacrestgroup.com
• MD5: 99f59e6f3fa993ba594a3d7077cc884d

Emotet Command-and-Control

Just seconds after the Emotet DLL download completes the victim machine starts communicating with an IP address classified as a botnet command-and-control server.

Image: Emotet C2 sessions in CapLoader

• C2 IP: 209.15.236.39
• C2 IP: 147.139.134.226
• C2 IP: 134.209.156.68
• JA3: 51c64c77e60f3980eea90869b68c58a8
• JA3S: ec74a5c51106f0419184d0dd08fb05bc
• JA3S: fd4bc6cea4877646ccd62f0792ec0b62

Emotet Spambot

The victim PC eventually started sending out spam emails. The spam bot used TLS encryption when possible, either through SMTPS (implicit TLS) or with help of STARTTLS (explicit TLS).

Image: Emotet spambot JA3 hash in NetworkMiner Professional

• SMTPS JA3: 37cdab6ff1bd1c195bacb776c5213bf2
• STARTTLS JA3: 37cdab6ff1bd1c195bacb776c5213bf2

Transmitted Spam

Below is a spam email sent from the victim PC without TLS encryption. The attached zip file contains a malicious Excel spreadsheet, which is designed to infect new victims with Emotet.

Image: Spam email extracted from Emotet PCAP with NetworkMiner

• .zip Attachment MD5: 5df1c719f5458035f6be2a071ea831db
• .xlsm Attachment MD5: 79cb3df6c0b7ed6431db76f990c68b5b

Network Forensics Training

If you want to learn additional techniques for analyzing network traffic, then take a look at our upcoming network forensic trainings.

Posted by Erik Hjelmvik on Monday, 09 May 2022 06:50:00 (UTC/GMT)

Tags: #Emotet​ #C2​ #video​ #pcap​ #JA3​ #JA3S​ #51c64c77e60f3980eea90869b68c58a8​ #ec74a5c51106f0419184d0dd08fb05bc​ #fd4bc6cea4877646ccd62f0792ec0b62​ #SMTP​ #SMTPS​ #Windows Sandbox​ #videotutorial​​

How the SolarWinds Hack (almost) went Undetected

My lightning talk from the SEC-T 0x0D conference has now been published on YouTube. This 13 minute talk covers tactics and techniques that the SolarWinds hackers used in order to avoid being detected.

Some of these tactics included using DNS based command-and-control (C2) that mimicked Amazon AWS DNS traffic, blending in with SolarWind’s legitimate source code and handpicking only a small number of targets.

One thing I forgot to mention in my SEC-T talk though, was the speed at which the attackers were working to analyze incoming data from the trojanized installs and selecting organizations to target for stage two operations.

For example, just during June 2020 the attackers got more than 1300 new organizations that started beaconing in using the DNS-based C2. The beaconed data only included the organizations’ Active Directory domain name and a list of installed security applications. Based on this information the attackers had to decide whether or not they wanted to target the organization. We have previously estimated that less than 1% of the organizations were targeted, while the malicious backdoor was disabled for all the other 99% who had installed the trojanized SolarWinds Orion update.

The attackers typically decided whether or not to target an organization within one week from when they started beaconing. This means that the attackers probably had several hundred organizations in queue for a targeting decision on any given week between April and August 2020. That's a significant workload!

Posted by Erik Hjelmvik on Monday, 18 October 2021 10:30:00 (UTC/GMT)

Tags: #SolarWinds​ #SEC-T​ #video​ #backdoor​ #SUNBURST​ #Solorigate​ #STAGE2​ #Stage 2​ #DNS​ #C2​ #ASCII-art​

Targeting Process for the SolarWinds Backdoor

The SolarWinds Orion backdoor, known as SUNBURST or Solorigate, has been analyzed by numerous experts from Microsoft, FireEye and several anti-virus vendors. However, we have noticed that many of the published reports are either lacking or incorrect in how they describe the steps involved when a client gets targeted by the threat actors. We have therefore decided to publish this writeup, which is based on the analysis we did of the SolarWinds backdoor when creating our SunburstDomainDecoder tool.

UPDATE March 1, 2021

Fixed errors in the Stage 2 beacon structure and added a CyberChef recipe link.

avsvmcloud.com DNS queries are not DGA related

The DNS communication between the backdoored SolarWinds Orion clients and the authoritative name server for avsvmcloud.com is not caused by a Domain Generation Algorithm (DGA), it's actually a fully functional two-way communication C2 channel. The clients encode information, such as the internal AD domain and installed security applications into the DNS queries and the DNS responses from the name server are used to instruct the clients to continue beaconing, stop beaconing or to target a client by proceeding to what we call Stage 2 operation. Thus, the authoritative name server for avsvmcloud.com was actually the C2 server for Stage 1 and 2 operation of the SolarWinds backdoor.

Image: SolarWinds Backdoor State Diagram

Command: Continue Beaconing

The default response from the name server is the "Continue Beaconing" command, which indicates that the threat actors have not yet decided if the SolarWinds client is of interest for further activity. Receiving a DNS A record in any of the following net ranges instructs the SolarWinds backdoor to continue beaconing:

• 8.18.144.0/23
• 71.152.53.0/24
• 87.238.80.0/21
• 199.201.117.0/24

In "Stage 1" operation the SUNBURST client starts out in the "New" mode where it exfiltrates the internal AD domain name. The AD domain data is often split into multiple DNS queries to reduce the length of each DNS query. The client later proceeds to the "Append" mode when the full AD domain has been exfiltrated. In "Append" mode the client transmits a list of installed or running security applications to the DNS C2 server, as we have described in our Extracting Security Products from SUNBURST DNS Beacons blog post. The client remains in Append mode until it gets either terminated or targeted.

Note: It is also possible to reset a client back to the "New" mode with a so-called "Ipx" command, but that is out of scope for this blog post.

Command: Stop Beaconing

The stop beaconing command terminates the DNS beaconing, so that the client no longer retrieves any commands from the C2 server. The C2 communication is stopped after receiving a DNS DNS A or AAAA record in any of the following ranges:

• 20.140.0.0/15
• 96.31.172.0/24
• 131.228.12.0/22
• 144.86.226.0/24
• 10.0.0.0/8
• 172.16.0.0/12
• 192.168.0.0/16
• 224.0.0.0/3
• fc00:: - fe00::
• fec0:: - ffc0::
• ff00::

Command: Target Client

A SUNBURST client that has been "targeted" will change a flag called rec.dnssec in the source code from false to true. We call this flag the "Stage 2" flag, which must be set in order for the client to accept a CNAME record and proceed to Stage 3. Symantec refer to the Stage 2 flag as "a bit flag representing whether the previous DNS response successfully contained partial or full instructions to start the secondary HTTP communication channel".

A DNS A record in any of the following three IP ranges can be used to set the "Stage 2" flag:

• 18.130.0.0/16
• 99.79.0.0/16
• 184.72.0.0/15

The state of the Stage 2 flag is actually signaled in the avsvmcloud.com DNS queries, which is how we managed to identify the AD domains of 23 targeted organizations just by analyzing SUNBURST DNS queries.

Stage 2 DNS Request Structure

The structure of the SUNBURST DNS queries in Stage 1 is pretty well described by Prevasio and Symantec, so we will not cover those in this blog post. Instead we will focus specifically on the structure of the DNS queries transmitted in Stage 2 operation, where the clients request a CNAME record from the name server.

As we have explained previously the exfiltrated data gets base32 encoded, using the custom alphabet "ph2eifo3n5utg1j8d94qrvbmk0sal76c", in order to ensure that only valid domain name characters are used in the DNS beacons.

The structure of the Stage 2 request, before it gets base32 encoded and appended as an avsvmcloud.com subdomain, looks like this:

Image: Stage 2 beacon structure of the SolarWinds backdoor

The base32 encoding not only uses a custom alphabet, it also employs a reversed endianess and byte order compared to "normal" implementations. We have created a CyberChef recipe that performs this custom base32 decoding, so that the structure can be verified more easily. A list with 45 different Stage 2 avsvmcloud.com subdomains can be found in our Finding Targeted SUNBURST Victims with pDNS blog post. Feel free to replace the input to our CyberChef recipe with any of those subdomains.

Sleep Timers

The DNS responses from the name server not only controls how the SolarWinds backdoor should transition between the various stages, it also controls for how long the backdoor should wait before sending the next DNS beacon.

The delay is assigned by AND-ing the last octet of the received IP address with bitmask 0x54. The result from the AND operation is then used to select a sleep interval in the table below, within which the client picks a random number of minutes to sleep.

An exception to the table above is clients that have entered Stage 2, which will only wait one to three minutes before requesting a CNAME.

Example DNS C2 for a Non-Targeted Client

Below is an example of DNS queries and responses from a SUNBURST client that wasn't targeted by the threat actors. These particular queries and responses come from a post on SolarWinds' community forum.

• 2020-07-04 00:03 UTC
  Query: if9prvp9o36mhihw2hrs260g12eu1 ⇒ AD domain "omeros.local"
  Response: 8.18.145.139 ⇒ sleep 1h, then Continue
• 2020-07-04 01:08 UTC
  Query: hnhb3v1b37dvv09icg0edp0 ⇒ Carbon Black is running
  Response: 8.18.145.62 ⇒ sleep 1 day, then Continue
• 2020-07-05 01:15 UTC
  Query: ea99hr2sfen95nkjlc5g ⇒ Nothing new to report
  Response: 8.18.144.150 ⇒ sleep 1 day, then Continue
• 2020-07-06 02:42 UTC
  Query: 707gigk9vbc923hf27fe ⇒ Nothing new to report
  Response: 8.18.145.151 ⇒ sleep 1 day, then Continue
• 2020-07-07 03:52 UTC
  Query: 6eivqct649pcg0g16ol4 ⇒ Nothing new to report
  Response: 20.140.84.127 ⇒ Stop DNS beacon

Note: Queried domain names in this list are subdomains of appsync-api.eu-west-1.avsvmcloud.com.

Example DNS C2 for a Targeted Client

Disclaimer: We have very few DNS queries and responses for targeted victims, hence the transactions below are improvised based on data from VriesHd, Joe Słowik and FireEye. Please view these transactions as an example of what the communication might look like for a targeted victim rather than what actually happened to this particular target.

• 2020-06-11 04:00 UTC
  Query: r8stkst71ebqgj66ervisu10bdohu0gt ⇒ AD domain, part 1 "central.pima.g"
  Response: 8.18.144.1 ⇒ Sleep 1h, then Continue
• 2020-06-11 05:00 UTC
  Query: ulfmcf44qd58t9e82w ⇒ AD domain, part 2 "ov"
  Response: 8.18.144.2 ⇒ Sleep 1h, then Continue
• 2020-06-11 06:00 UTC
  Query: p50jllhvhmoti8mpbf6p2di ⇒ Nothing to report
  Response: 8.18.144.16 ⇒ Sleep 8h, then Continue
• 2020-06-11 14:00 UTC
  Query: (?) ⇒ Nothing new to report
  Response: 8.18.144.17 ⇒ Sleep 8h, then Continue
• 2020-06-11 22:35 UTC
  Query: j5uqlssr1hfqnn8hkf172mp ⇒ Nothing to report
  Response: 184.72.181.52 ⇒ Target client for Stage 2 operation (1-3 minutes sleep)
• 2020-06-11 22:37 UTC
  Query: 7sbvaemscs0mc925tb99 ⇒ Client in Stage 2 operation, requesting CNAME
  Response: deftsecurity.com ⇒ CNAME for Stage 3 HTTPS C2 server

Note: Queried domains in this list are subdomains of appsync-api.us-west-2.avsvmcloud.com.

Conclusions

We hope this blog post clears up any misunderstandings regarding the targeting process of the SolarWinds backdoor and highlights the significance of the Stage 2 flag.

We warmly welcome any feedback or questions you might have regarding this writeup, please feel free to contact us or reach out to us through Twitter.

Posted by Erik Hjelmvik on Wednesday, 17 February 2021 20:22:00 (UTC/GMT)

Tags: #SolarWinds​ #backdoor​ #SUNBURST​ #Solorigate​ #FireEye​ #Microsoft​ #CNAME​ #STAGE2​ #Stage 2​ #DNS​ #avsvmcloud.com​ #C2​ #CyberChef​ #ASCII-art​

Finding Targeted SUNBURST Victims with pDNS

Our SunburstDomainDecoder tool can now be used to identify SUNBURST victims that have been explicitly targeted by the attackers. The only input needed is passive DNS (pDNS) data for avsvmcloud.com subdomains.

Companies and organizations that have installed trojanized a SolarWinds Orion update containing the SUBURST backdoor will send DNS queries for seemingly random subdomains of avsvmcloud.com. Some of these DNS queries actually contain the victim's internal AD domain encoded into the subdomain, as explained in our blog post Reassembling Victim Domain Fragments from SUNBURST DNS.

Three Stages of SUNBURST Backdoor Operation

Most SUNBURST victims were luckily not targeted by the attackers. This means that the backdoor never made it past "STAGE1" of the infection process. Nevertheless, the attackers did choose to proceed to "STAGE2" with some victims. As explained in FireEye's blog post SUNBURST Additional Technical Details, the "C2 coordinator" can proceed to the next stage by responding with a DNS A record pointing to an IP address within any of these three ranges:

• 18.130.0.0/16
• 99.79.0.0/16
• 184.72.0.0/15

According to FireEye's "Diagram of actor operations and usage of SUNBURST", the decision to proceed to the next stage is based upon whether or not the victim's internal AD domain is "interesting to attack".

Note: "STAGE2" is referred to as "associated mode" in FireEye's blog post.

SUNBURST backdoors that have entered STAGE2 will allow CNAME records in DNS responses to be used as new C2 domains.

We have discovered that the SUNBURST backdoor actually uses a single bit in the queried avsvmcloud.com subdomain in order to flag that it has entered STAGE2 and is accepting new C2 domains in CNAME records. This bit is called flag, ext or dnssec in the malicious SUNBURST implant and can be extracted from DNS queries that have an encoded timestamp, such as those indicating which security products that are installed.

Detecting STAGE2 DNS Requests

Our SunburstDomainDecoder tool has now been updated to include a "STAGE2" tag in the output for DNS queries containing this stage 2 flag. This means that organizations like national CERTs, who perform incident response coordination and victim notification, can now use SunburstDomainDecoder in order to identify and notify targeted SUNBURST victims that have entered STAGE2.

Here's the output we get when feeding SunburstDomainDecoder with Bambenek's uniq-hostnames.txt passive DNS data and only displaying lines containing "STAGE2":

Most of these subdomains are listed in FireEye's Indicator_Release_NBIs.csv file as having CNAME pointers to other SUNBURST C2 domains like: freescanonline[.]com, deftsecurity[.]com and thedoccloud[.]com. But the first domain, with GUID 22334A7227544B1E, was actually not part of FireEye's IOC data.

Even more STAGE2 domains and GUID values can be found by analyzing other passive DNS resources, such as this passive DNS dump on pastebin by Rohit Bansal.

After removing the domains already present in FireEye's IOC we're left with the following FQDN's that have been requested by SUNBURST backdoors in STAGE2:

• 1dbecfd99ku6fi2e5fjb.appsync-api.us-east-1.avsvmcloud.com
• 4n4vte5gmor7j9lpegsf.appsync-api.eu-west-1.avsvmcloud.com
• 5qbtj04rcbp3tiq8bo6t.appsync-api.us-east-1.avsvmcloud.com

Update January 7, 2021

Paul Vixie kindly shared his SunburstDomainDecoder output on Twitter yesterday. Paul's results show that the victim with GUID FC07EB59E028D3EE, which corresponds to the "6a57jk2ba1d9keg15cbg.appsync-api.eu-west-1.avsvmcloud[.]com" CNAME entry in FireEye's IOC, was Pima County. This means that 3C327147876E6EA4 is the only GUID among the CNAME records published by FireEye that cannot yet be tied to a victim organization. Paul's data also reveals two new STAGE2 victim GUIDs (65A28A36F24D379D and 8D2267C5A00796DA).

Update January 12, 2021

With help of SunburstDomainDecoder 1.9 and passive DNS data from Dancho Danchev we've been able to verify that Palo Alto have installed the maliocous SUNBURST backdoor and that it entered into STAGE2 opreration on September 29, 2020. Palo Alto's CEO Nikesh Arora has confirmed that they were hit by SUNBURST (or "SolarStorm" as they call it).

Update January 25, 2021

On December 17 VriesHd tweeted a link to a Google Docs spreatsheet containing aggregated SUNBURST DNS request data.

One month later VriesHd made some substatial additions to the "SB2" spreadsheet, which by then contained several new STAGE2 victims. We have since then actively been trying to reach out to the targeted organizations, either directly or through CERT organizations, who perform incident response coordination and help with the victim notification process. VriesHd's passive DNS collection has now been incorporated into the SUNBURST STAGE2 Victim Table below.

Targeted SUNBURST Victims

Here's a summary of the STAGE2 beacons from SUNBURST victims that can be extracted from publicly available data:

SUNBURST STAGE2 Victim Table
Sources: John Bambenek, Joe Słowik, Rohit Bansal, Dancho Danchev , Paul Vixie, FireEye and VriesHd.

Identifying More SUNBURST STAGE2 Victims

Companies and organizations with access to more passive DNS resources will hopefully be able to use SunburstDomainDecoder to identify additional targeted SUNBURST victims that have progressed to STAGE2.

Download SunburstDomainDecoder

Our tool SunburstDomainDecoder is released under a Creative Commons CC-BY license, and can be downloaded here:

You can also read more about SunburstDomainDecoder in our blog post Reassembling Victim Domain Fragments from SUNBURST DNS.

Posted by Erik Hjelmvik on Monday, 04 January 2021 21:11:00 (UTC/GMT)

Tags: #Netresec​ #pDNS​ #SUNBURST​ #SolarWinds​ #Solorigate​ #SunburstDomainDecoder​ #SolarStorm​ #STAGE2​ #avsvmcloud​ #C2​

Extracting Security Products from SUNBURST DNS Beacons

The latest version of our SunburstDomainDecoder (v1.7) can be used to reveal which endpoint protection applications that are installed on trojanized SolarWinds Orion deployments. The security application info is extracted from DNS queries for "avsvmcloud.com" subdomains, which is used by SUNBURST as a beacon and C2 channel.

Here's an example showing that City of Kingston, Ontario, Canada were running Windows Defender on their trojanized SolarWinds deployment back in June:

The "F9A9387F7D252842" value is the victim's unique SUNBURST GUID. See our blog post Reassembling Victim Domain Fragments from SUNBURST DNS for more info about how the GUID value is encoded into the DNS traffic.

You can also run SunburstDomainDecoder in Linux, with help of Mono, like this:

The file "uniq-hostnames.txt" is a publicly available SUNBURST passive DNS repository created by Bambenek Consulting.

Security Product Statistics

It is also possible to use the passive DNS data shared by Bambenek, Joe Słowik and others to compute statistics of which security products that are popular among SolarWinds' customers.

It is worth mentioning that SUNBURST does not report status for several other major endpoint protection vendors, such as Kaspersky, McAfee, Symantec, Sophos or Trend Micro.

Download SunburstDomainDecoder

Our tool SunburstDomainDecoder is released under a Creative Commons CC-BY license, and can be downloaded here:
https://www.netresec.com/files/SunburstDomainDecoder.zip

You can also read more about SunburstDomainDecoder in our blog post Reassembling Victim Domain Fragments from SUNBURST DNS.

Posted by Erik Hjelmvik on Tuesday, 29 December 2020 09:38:00 (UTC/GMT)

Tags: #SunburstDomainDecoder​ #SUNBURST​ #SolarWinds​ #Solorigate​ #DNS​ #Windows Defender​ #Carbon Black​ #FireEye​ #ESET​ #F-Secure​ #C2​ #beacon​

Examining an x509 Covert Channel

Jason Reaves gave a talk titled “Malware C2 over x509 certificate exchange” at BSides Springfield 2017, where he demonstrated that the SSL handshake can be abused by malware as a covert command-and-control (C2) channel.

He got the idea while analyzing the Vawtrak malware after discovering that it read multiple fields in the X.509 certificate provided by the server before proceeding. Jason initially thought these fields were used as a C2 channel, but then realized that Vawtrak performed a variant of certificate pinning in order to discover SSL man-in-the-middle attempts.

Nevertheless, Jason decided to actually implement a proof-of-concept (PoC) that uses the X.509 certificate as a C2 channel. Jason’s code is now available on GitHub along with a PCAP file demonstrating this covert C2 channel. Of course I couldn’t resist having a little look at this PCAP file in NetworkMiner.

The first thing I noticed was that the proof-of-concept PCAP ran the SSL session on TCP 4433, which prevented NetworkMiner from parsing the traffic as SSL. However, I was able to parse the SSL traffic with NetworkMiner Professional just fine thanks to the port-independent-protocol-identification feature (a.k.a Dynamic Port Detection), which made the Pro-version parse TCP 4433 as SSL/TLS.

A “normal” x509 certificate size is usually around 1kB, so certificates that are 11kB should be considered as anomalies. Also, opening one of these .cer files reveals an extremely large value in the Subject Key Identifier field.

Not only is this field very large, it also starts with the familiar “4D 5A” MZ header sequence.

NetworkMiner additionally parses details from the certificates that it extracts from PCAP files, so the Subject Key Identifier field is actually accessible from within NetworkMiner, as shown in the screenshot below.

You can also see that NetworkMiner validates the certificate using the local trusted root certificates. Not surprisingly, this certificates is not trusted (certificate valid = FALSE). It would be most unlikely that anyone would manage to include arbitrary data like this in a signed certificate.

Extracting the MZ Binary from the Covert X.509 Channel

Even though NetworkMiner excels at pulling out files from PCAPs, this is definitively an occasion where manual handling is required. Jason’s PoC implementation actually uses a whopping 79 individual certificates in order to transfer this Mimikatz binary, which is 785 kB.

Here’s a tshark oneliner you can use to extract the Mimikatz binary from Jason's example PCAP file.

tshark -r mimikatz_sent.pcap -Y 'ssl.handshake.certificate_length gt 2000' -T fields -e x509ce.SubjectKeyIdentifier -d tcp.port==4433,ssl | tr -d ':\n' | xxd -r -p > mimikatz.exe

Detecting x509 Anomalies

Even though covert channels using x509 certificates isn’t a “thing” (yet?) it’s still a good idea to think about how this type of covert signaling can be detected. Just looking for large Subject Key Identifier fields is probably too specific, since there are other fields and extensions in X.509 that could also be used to transmit data. A better approach would be to alert on certificates larger than, let’s say, 3kB. Multiple certificates can also be chained together in a single TLS handshake certificate record, so it would also make sense to look for handshake records larger than 8kB (rough estimate).

This type of anomaly-centric intrusion detection is typically best done using the Bro IDS, which provides easy programmatic access to the X.509 certificate and SSL handshake.

There will be false positives when alerting on large certificates in this manner, which is why I recommend to also check if the certificates have been signed by a trusted root or not. A certificate that is signed by a trusted root is very unlikely to contain malicious data.

Posted by Erik Hjelmvik on Tuesday, 06 February 2018 12:13:00 (UTC/GMT)

Tags: #malware​ #C2​ #SSL​ #TLS​ #certificate​ #NetworkMiner​ #PCAP​ #x509​ #X.509​ #PIPI​ #Bro​ #IDS​ #tshark​